Successful medical, preclinical, and scientific research requires adequate funding for facilities, supplies, and personnel. Many researchers get grants from the government, but over the last few years, as the government is spending less and less on the science sector, non-governmental sources have been funding a larger percentage of the research undertaken in the United States.
According to ongoing surveys by the National Science Foundation, the percentage of funds that federal agencies are providing for research continues to shrink. From the 1960s through the early 2000s, the federal government accounted for up to 70% of research funds, but that number dipped below 50% in 2013—the lowest it had been since World War II.
Since then, the government’s share in research funding has continued to decline, and the U.S. budget proposal for 2019 called for a 43% reduction in non-defense spending by 2028.
So where is the money for research coming from? Increasingly, it’s coming from corporate and private investors.
On the business side, the pharmaceutical industry was an early driver of the increase in corporate spending over the last decade, with drug companies almost tripling their spending on basic research between 2008 and 2014. Overall corporate spending on research increased from $13.9 billion to $24.5 billion over that same period.
Scientific research spending in the corporate community has flattened out in recent years, however, with a lot of research moving overseas. In the future, U.S-based researchers may benefit less from corporate investment and more from a worldwide movement toward philanthropy.
According to an annual report on philanthropy by the Giving USA Foundation, American individuals, bequests, foundations and corporations made charitable donations totaling $428 billion in 2018. Individuals gave $292 billion, and foundations gave a record-high $75.9 billion, up 7.3% over the previous year.
That increase might be due in part to the Giving Pledge, established in 2010 by Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates as a commitment by the wealthiest people in America to give more than half their wealth away.
In 2013 the Giving Pledge went international, and as of 2019 more than 200 of the wealthiest individuals, couples, and families in the world have taken the pledge. Each person is free to pledge money to any cause or organization they wish to support, and many have turned to scientific and medical research.
In November, Sandy and Joan Weill donated $106 million to start the Weill Neurohub at the University of California at Berkeley, University of California at San Francisco and the University of Washington. In 2016 the couple gave $185 million to University of California at San Francisco for work in neuroscience.
MacKenzie Bezos, who signed the pledge in May 2019 after her divorce from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, has given money to medical research into cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. In 2017, the Bezos family donated $35 million to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has given billions to scientific research, including research on infectious diseases, STDs, and HIV/AIDS.
The Michael J. Fox Foundation has given upwards of $700 million to Parkinson’s research
The late Ted Stanley, who co-founded the Danbury Mint, pledged $650 million to the Broad Institute to explore connections between genetics and severe mental illnesses.
The late Paul Allen, co-founder or Microsoft, made two $100-million pledges to create the Allen Institute for Cell Science and the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle.
Other private individuals and foundations that make major donations to science include, the Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, David and Lucille Packard Foundation, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.
As the need for funding grows and government allocations for scientific research continue to decrease, many researchers may find themselves turning to the private sector for the funding they need.
Related Posts
RFID Microchips for Mice and Rats: A Guide to Rodent Identification
Laboratory Animal Management: Building Better Rodent Research Workflows
CODA vs. Other Rodent Blood Pressure Systems: How to Compare Tail-Cuff Options
Rat as a Model Organism: Advantages, Limitations, and When to Use Rats in Research
Tail-Cuff vs. Telemetry: How to Choose Based on Study Design
How to Reduce Waste Anesthetic Gas in Rodent Workflows
Guide to Green Anesthesia in Research Labs
Traditional vs. Integrated Digital: How to choose Anesthetic Vaporizers
Research Workflows: What to Consider When Choosing Between Rats and Mice?
Guide to Waste Anesthesia Gas Leakage and Compliance
Building a Preclinical Procedure Station: Anesthesia, Oxygen, Monitoring, and Surgical Tools
Waste Anesthetic Gas’ Impacts on the Environment
Important Note: The content on this blog is general educational material. It is not a protocol, regulatory guidance, veterinary recommendation, clinical directive, or safety instruction for any specific laboratory, study, animal model, institution, species, procedure, or equipment configuration.
Do not apply any information from this blog to your research without first independently confirming that it is appropriate for your specific protocol, species, model, equipment configuration, firmware version, institutional requirements, IACUC or ethical review approvals, safety policies, and applicable regulations. To the extent any content on this blog addresses Kent Scientific or other specific products, it does not replace, modify, or supplement the official User Manual or product labeling for those products.
Kent Scientific assumes no liability for any outcome resulting from reliance on blog content. Every research environment is different, and the suitability of any approach described here for your specific circumstances can only be determined by qualified personnel with knowledge of your particular setup, protocol, and regulatory obligations. Always consult your institutional veterinarian, IACUC, facility leadership, safety officer, and official product documentation before implementing any change to your procedures.
























